One of the few quality businesses in the oilfield services (OFS) sector
|
More of a specialty chemicals company than an OFS business
|
|
>75% of EBITDA tied to production - recurring, longer duration revenue
|
|
CHX generates mid-teens ROIC including adding back covid-era impairment
|
|
CHX has consistently out-performed peers on key metrics like ROIC, margins, FCF conversion, working capital intensity
|
|
FCF conversion above peers, despite smaller size, yet trades at discount to peers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHX's business is tied to production, not drilling - that gives it longer duration vs peer OFS companies where 80%+ of sales is tied to drilling and completions capex
|
|
This makes CHX unique: peers are tied to O&G capex vs. CHX which is tied to opex
|
|
|
This link to production has led to less significant positive earnings revisions than other OFS companies over the last two years, but will also be more defensive in a downturn
|
|
Terminal value is a big issue for OFS companies but less of an issue for CHX where reveues are tied to total liquids production globally (oil + water)
|
|
CHX organic growth exceeds oil demand growth by ~3x from mix shift to harder to produce bbls
|
|
|
|
|
CHX's most valuable asset is Nalco Energy Services - the leader in offshore oilfield chemicals
|
|
CHX’s Offshore division is the technology leader in offshore O&G chemicals – a legacy of when predecessor Nalco dominated the deepwater chemicals industry for decades.
|
|
Nalco’s Energy division was acquired by Ecolab for 10.9x NTM EBITDA (1.8x Sales) in 2011
|
|
Nalco's technical expertise is critical to offshore production, customers bring in Nalco years before production begins - this drives close relationship, high visibility for CHX
|
|
|
Visibility on customer production ramps drives CHX mgmt confidence in HSD organic growth for Chemicals (we estimate MSD)
|
|
Nalco was the technical advisor responsible for starting up over 2/3 of all Offshore fields producing today
|
|
Offshore is CHX's best business:
|
|
|
- Duopoly with BKR (~40-50% share on Deepwater vs. 26% of global OFS chems market)
|
|
|
|
- CHX technical abilities far above BKR- BKR often brought in for security of supply diversification
|
|
|
|
- Rational competition - some gains/losses for each but no significant competition on price
|
|
|
|
- CHX's superior service has led to them gaining share in key geographies from BKR
|
|
|
- High growth: Deepwater production growing mid-teens CAGR
|
|
|
- Highest margins: we estimate over 10% higher margins than Onshore (mid-20%s vs. low-to-mid-teens for onshore)
|
|
- BKR formers: CHX's customers care more about technical expertise and service than price - different customers than BKR
|
|
|
|
|
CHX can grow sales organically mid-single digits in most oil price environments
|
|
Structural growth drivers:
|
|
|
1) Deepwater + Ultra Deepwater
|
|
|
|
- 40% of PCT is Offshore growing double-digits… growing offshore % of mix will boost margins (+1000bps higher margins than Onshore)
|
|
|
2) MidEast onshore unconventionals
|
|
|
|
- Jafurah: $100bn onshore gas project in Saudi
|
|
|
3) Growth of artificial lift from maturing shale fields
|
|
|
|
- Increasing intensity of artificial lift per well as resevoirs becomes less productive - requiring more lift to make up for the loss
|
|
|
4) CHX sells to majors in US onshore whose production growth is expected to exceed the NAM average of ~flat to LSD %
|
|
MSD sales growth leads to mid-double digit FCF growth incl. capital return (%) - high-teens total return
|
|
With lower sales growth, working capital outflow should abate and FCF conversion should improve
|
|
|
|
|
Upside from leading emissions monitoring and Digital Oilfield products
|
|
Digital (Oilfield IoT) has seen very strong growth and now represents 25% of PAT sales
|
|
|
85% of segment sales are edge hardware for the monitoring of production assets
|
|
|
15% of sales is production optimization software
|
|
Management sees digital as a 20% growth opportunity as a segment and will likely separate it into its own segment
|
|
|
Formers framed the growth algorithm as MSD to HSD price and 5 to 15% volume growth from new customers and expansions
|
|
|
Resilient growth even in the face of weaker completions - digital expected to grow 17% in 2023 despite double digit decline in NAM rig counts
|
|
CHX owns a leading emissions monitoring service, which benefits from a growing focus on methane emissions in O&G production - a major GHG contributor
|
|
|
- Market leader in emissions monitoring by installed base
|
|
|
- Potential for regulations to significantly accelerate growth
|
|
|
- Currently $20mm of revenues, upside case is $100mm in 5-years as management expects 30 to 40% growth
|
|
These businesses have been immaterial but are starting to become positive variance for margins next year
|
|
|
Digital as a whole is accretive to PAT, and the software business is even higher margin
|
|
|
We estimate Digital has 500-1000bps higher margins than current segment average (23% EBITDA margins)
|
|
|
|
|
CHX has attractive, predictable capital allocation, FCF conversion and shareholder return
|
|
CHX deserves premium multiple on clear capital allocation, no M&A risk, high shareholder return (~80% of FCF recently)
|
|
CHX FCF conversion very strong vs. peers - strong working capital mgmt vs. other OFS business
|
|
|
We estimate CHX can buyback 4-5% of shares per year growing sales MSD
|
|
We estimate top-line growth of MSD improves CHX FCF conversion to low-60% of EBITDA on lower WC investment requirements:
|