- The recent establishment of a hub in New York opening the door to thousands of asset managers, brokers, etc. to establish direct connections to BMV rather than going through an intermediary such as Bloomberg.
- Increasing connectivity fees, as the introduction of the new competing exchange in the Mexican market, coupled with regulatory requirements for best execution, have effectively required any financial institution trading in Mexican securities to purchase data from BMV.
- Introducing new fixed income data products in both trade and post-trade segments.
- Increasing number of index products, as the Company has an exclusive relationship with S&P to produce Mexican equity indices.
- And most importantly, the Company is launching the Latin America Data Exchange partnership in conjunction with BME, with the goal of distributing a standardized data feed across the LatAm exchanges directly to middle and back offices of financial institutions,
In total, we see enormous potential in this segment and note that the Company itself is conservatively guiding to 15% CAGR over the next 5 years from the information services business, believing the Latin America Data Exchange itself could potentially provide that level of growth.
Misperceived Competitor Risk
In July 2018, BIVA officially launched as the first competing cash equity exchange in Mexico. BIVA came to the market with the promise of correcting the mismatch of Mexico being the 13thlargest economy in the world, but only having ~140 listed companies on the stock exchange, essentially laying the blame at BMV’s feet for all the cultural and social reasons that Mexico does not have a more robust financial ecosystem. BIVA promised to correct this mismatch by IPOing 50 new companies in its first 3 years of operations, although to date BIVA has not IPOed a single company.
For years, investors have been incorrectly concerned about BIVA taking significant market share from BMV in their cash equity trading business and maintenance & listing fees, but we believe that these fears are unfounded, not only because those two businesses represent a relatively small portion of the overall business, but also because BIVA has had trouble gaining any real traction in either segment.
Maintenance & Listing Fees (17% of 2019 revenue)
One part of BMV that is considered under threat are maintenance & listing fees, which are annual fees paid by companies or the government to maintain their listing of their equity or debt. These fees are inflation linked, providing growth even in a flat volume market, but still set well below that of most other developed and emerging markets.
In absolute terms, these fees are de minimus to the underlying companies (only tens of thousands of dollars to maintain a listing), meaning there is little to no incentive to switch listing because 1) there is virtually no cost savings even if BIVA attempted to undercut BMV and 2) switching off BMV means you are no longer eligible for the S&P IPC Index, the largest Mexican equity index, given BMV and S&P have an exclusive relationship.
As such, while BIVA might win some new listings, evidenced by its current market share of 4% of listings, primarily on the debt and CKD (private equity) side, this remains a growing annuity for BMV purely based on its existing book of business.
Cash Equity Trading (8% of 2019 revenue)